<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bohannon Tech&#187; NETGEAR WNR3500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/tag/netgear-wnr3500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bohannontech.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tech Reviews &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I finally saw 38 Mbps of throughput over wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/2008/11/30/i-finally-saw-38-mbps-of-throughput-over-wireless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/2008/11/30/i-finally-saw-38-mbps-of-throughput-over-wireless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NETGEAR WNDA 3100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NETGEAR WNR3500]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bohannontech.com/blog2/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After nearly two weeks of performance testing, and using about a 12 different products, I seemed to have stumbled on the fastest wireless-n configuration to date: A NETGEAR WNR3500 in 300Mbps mode at Channel 6,10 and a NETGEAR WNDA 3100. The windows &#8230; <a href="http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/2008/11/30/i-finally-saw-38-mbps-of-throughput-over-wireless/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After nearly two weeks of performance testing, and using about a 12 different products, I seemed to have stumbled on the fastest wireless-n configuration to date:</p>
<p>A NETGEAR WNR3500 in 300Mbps mode at Channel 6,10 and a NETGEAR WNDA 3100.</p>
<p>The windows connection speed on my test PC showed 300 Mbps, and I had to have my test machine in the same room as the WNR3500. </p>
<p>The first test run was fairly fast, about 27 Mbps. The second test run was slower, about 25 Mbps, but during both of those tests I saw throughput spike to the high 30s, so I knew it could go faster if I got a &#8220;clean&#8221; run.</p>
<p>3rd time was a charm, I got clean test run that measured at 38 Mbps. Hey after a disappointing two weeks of product testing, that&#8217;s the fastest non-Ethernet connection I&#8217;ve seen.<span id="more-277"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that I got this result with the NETGEAR WNDA 3100,  after it had performed so poorly with another Netgear product, the WNDR 3300. I guess it works better with the WNR3500</p>
<p>One unusual twist: while testing the WNR3500 in 300 Mbps mode at channels 6,10 my home AP which I have set at channel 1 was completely unreachable. When I turned off the WNR3500 I could connect to my home AP again. I guess the WNR3500 is the king of the spectrum when its in 300Mbps mode.</p>
<p>Update 12/13/2008: I re-tested with this combination today, and I discovered that when I try to copy files to the server, the connection drops, and the adapter must be disabled/reenabled for it to connect to the network again. So I cannot recommend the WNDA 3100 anymore. Read my new post today to find the best setup so far.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bohannontech.com/blog/2008/11/30/i-finally-saw-38-mbps-of-throughput-over-wireless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

